Skip to content
Eptura
Feedback by UserVoice

Settings and activity

28 results found

  1. 89 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    In addition to Teams, Zoom links are also desired.

  2. 22 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    We're considering this feature for a future release. Please indicate whether or not this feature is best implemented system-wide or by role? That is, would it be better and more straightforward to offer recurring reservations for the whole deployment, or differentiate this ability by certain roles?

    Does this apply to hoteling bookings, or conference room reservations, or both? What is the priority?

  3. 58 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    Adding to this request for a "super user" to view all work requests, no matter the supervisor/team assigned, should this extend to allowing that "super user" to see all closed requests (read-only) without going to the separate "Search & Manage" view? This would be a different setting, but is allowing the user to see closed requests in the Maintenance Console another, related wish? Happy to get your thoughts...

    1) See all active work requests for your team (exists)
    2) See all active work requests no matter the team
    3) See all closed requests for your team
    4) See all closed requests no matter the team

  4. 65 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    Currently bookings that are canceled are removed from any bookings report. These bookings are removed from the table that captures bookings, as if they never occurred. The only record of canceled bookings is currently in the historical action items table (hactivity_log), but the data captured is insufficient in reporting any hoteling details.

    The use case is to report on bookings that were subsequently canceled. Canceled bookings represent inefficiencies because desks could have been available to others who were looking, and often canceled desks remain open because they were canceled too late for others to book.

  5. 92 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    How would this work exactly? I address an email to (for example) work@company.archibus.com...or I create a Teams chat to "archibus work ticket". I put in a description of the issue. Then what? Archibus creates a work request with the text as the work description? Archibus also has the requestor, the requestor location and contact info. Archibus doesn't yet have a problem type, so it gets routed to a reviewer/approver who then can put in a problem type and send it on its way? Is that about right?

    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) shared this idea  · 
  6. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  3 comments  ·  Archibus » Assets  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    Thanks for the idea and detail, Tiffany. Would import/export help in this case? I'm not sure if that would address the need you mention here, but thought I'd ask.

  7. 22 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Archibus » Space  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    As a facility or department manager, it's going to be hard for me to get the list together of who will be in the office and when. Better to crowd-source that information.

    In Workplace, can the employee profile display that information (days in office, back to work info) and have a way for the employee to update their own data?

  8. 78 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    Curious who has asked for this?

  9. 31 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    How do you envision this working? Is this more like booking rules where people in a certain team can book only on certain days?

  10. 45 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    For 25.2, we are implementing a way to create work requests for cleaning after hoteling use. Hoteled rooms would not be bookable for use until cleaning is done (using a new room status field and looking for "Available").

    SLAs are configurable for Reservation problem types like setup and cleanup.

    As for reservation rooms being blocked until cleaning is performed, it's a good idea, but not in 25.2. For now perhaps make the post block much longer (end of day).

  11. 21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Archibus » Platform  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    Is this a certification process first and foremost? It looks like it is. The product would undergo changes to comply with items identified during an evaluation - is that correct? If so, then would the first step to be sign up for certification. or are there items we know we need to fix before that step?

  12. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  1 comment  ·  Archibus » Platform  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    Consider additional cases that a Serraview Overlay can accommodate.

    For details, see:
    - https://serraview.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/FUS/pages/816873665/Fusion+-+For+Future+Consideration
    - https://serraview.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/FUS/pages/631930992/User+Stories+-+SaaS+Scenarios#Config-B:-All-Space-Management-&-Planning-in-Serraview;-Other-IWMS-Functions-in-Archibus
    - https://serraview.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/FUS/pages/631930992/User+Stories+-+SaaS+Scenarios#Out-of-Scope

    Among considerations:
    - syncing space allocations and occupancy back to Archibus outside of move orders
    - enabling SV Overlay for space validations
    - syncing teams from SV to AI
    - scenario phases and how they affect move projects in Archibus (from locations from previous moves, not from inventory)
    - syncing move tasks from Serraview to Archibus if they are maintenance items, to manage in Archibus as work orders

    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) shared this idea  · 
  13. 51 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    Could this be done by tagging locations?

  15. 82 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    Would this be something in Scenario Planner? Something like an occupancy % limit or guideline to help planners create scenarios around a target %?

  16. 30 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    From JD:

    Given a team, we can tell the team members who come & work in the office (top section) vs the team members who are flagged as predominantly WFH (maybe 1 day a week or occasionally come in the office). Can drag & drop between the 2 sections. Do this in the VBS first, then eventually Workplace (since CRE isn't going to be able to manage/maintain who WFH or transitioning back to the office without assistance from the business/Workplace Admins).

    I like the idea of columns with radio button representing designation either WFH or Office, might be an easier implementation & better UX). I'd say trying to get down to tracking # of days a person works from home might present too much of an overhead to collect this information & manage/keep up to date ongoing for CRE or Admins not to mention calcs as you said. I think CRE just needs to keep it simple/high level like if a person works from home 3-4 days a week then that person is considered WFH & shouldn't count towards determining how many desks a team needs.

    If they want they can still account for the WFH people (in terms of desk) by using ratios e.g Team of 10, 5 work in the office & 5 work from home, so that team needs minimum 5 desk + maybe 2 desks for the WFH people so a Target Ratio of 1.7 or something along those lines.

  17. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    As an Engage user, I'd like to use Engage to create service requests, which would then be managed within Serraview. Service requests can include catering, meeting resources, maintenance issues, hot/cold calls, and any other facility services that the FM department offers its employees.

    support back2work from covid

  18. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    This relates to an idea & feature in Archibus: API for Engage.

    I'll link this idea into that feature. I imagine work would have to be done on both Engage and Archibus for the connection to work.

  19. 42 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    Using sensors, provide automation for desks and spaces to:
    - prompt a user to confirm they have arrived at the desk and check in
    - prompt a user to cancel a booking if they are not detected at the desk after check in time, and cancel the booking if not cancelled or booked in
    - Automatically cancel a space booking if no activity is detected

  20. 49 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  7 comments  ·  Archibus » Workplace  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminFred Kraus (Admin, Eptura) commented  · 

    Use Case:
    Company XYZ needs different types of users to view Floor Plans that are relevant to each of those user types.

    · Space Manager: Needs to have only the core Architecture and Room graphics displayed.

    · Asset Manager: Needs to have only the core Architecture, Room Graphics, and relevant assets displayed.

    · General Employee: Would like to see a floor plan that displays an easier on the eyes view, less technical. Analogous to a Mall layout, displays an uncluttered view of the floor for easy navigation.

    Allow different types of end users to be able to see a floor plan view that is most useful within the context of what information that is of most interest, in an intuitive and uncluttered way.

    Enhancements to both the Enterprise Graphics Publishing and the WC Floor Plan viewing.

← Previous 1