Settings and activity
80 results found
-
16 votes
Tiffany Lam shared this idea ·
-
5 votes
Tiffany Lam supported this idea ·
-
36 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tiffany Lam supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tiffany Lam commented
Hi, there are RFPs asking for compatbility with IE 11 as a minimum. No other browsers were supported organizationally. Please do consider providing IE support again for V25 onwards.
Tiffany Lam shared this idea ·
-
8 votes
Tiffany Lam supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Tiffany Lam commented
The method you suggested technically works but it probably is less attractive as a product stand point and comparing to other product that have library stamping abilities. I would find it hard to convince someone that they should export and re-import data that lives in 3 separate tables. So the intent is if a client has say 25 fields they want stamped into several new assets, why are they adding them one at a time per asset? Why wouldn't the equipment standards be setup to help stamp in all the fields so that all the user has to change is a unique value such as a serial number?
Let me show you the comparison
Current method for adding in 10 assets that are pretty the same:
1. Add bulk assets via the registry
2. Pick a standard, opt to fill in the location, department value and status
3. Go next, now fill in all the other fields such as manufacturer, PO number, warranty supplier, warranty end dates, service contract, install dates, service dates, Telecom software operating system, CSI values 1, CSI values 2, CSI values 3, Descriptions, Equipment use values, custodian, purchase price, replacement cost
4. Go save and edit next
5. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 2
6. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 3
7. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 4
8. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 5
9. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 6
10. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 7
11. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 8
12. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 9
13. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 10Can you see how that is time consuming? It'll take anywhere from half an hour to an hour to update these 10 assets. The intent would be that this is a user who wouldn't need the smart client tool as they are registering new assets.
So the purposed way would be to simplify the 3rd step.
Let me show you the comparison if we had a method to just stamp in the fields that could be linked to the equipment standard level.
Current method for adding in 10 assets that are pretty the same:
1. Add bulk assets via the registry
2. Pick a standard, opt to fill in the location, department value and status
3. Go next, change the serial number of the asset.
4. Go save and edit next
5. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 2
6. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 3
7. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 4
8. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 5
9. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 6
10. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 7
11. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 8
12. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 9
13. Repeat steps 3 and Step 4 for asset 10Does that make sense on how I have less tabs of less fields to need to copy and repeat over again and thus reduce the chance of making data errors too in the process? So turning this to a 3 minute process.
Tiffany Lam shared this idea ·
-
18 votes
Tiffany Lam supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
Tiffany Lam supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Tiffany Lam commented
Would have been nice to have a signatures table that can link to various other tables. Especially since we're moving to a digital signature world.
Tiffany Lam shared this idea ·
-
7 votes
Tiffany Lam shared this idea ·
-
4 votes
Tiffany Lam shared this idea ·
-
4 votes
Tiffany Lam shared this idea ·
-
6 votes
Tiffany Lam shared this idea ·
-
99 votes
Tiffany Lam shared this idea ·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tiffany Lam commented
It would be nice if the description actually explained what happens if the group was added or not or at least point to the help file link that explains what it is for. For example, there's a couple where it becomes difficult to decide whether it's needed or not for a role because the description was too vague and the help files didn't really explain it.
-
28 votes
Tiffany Lam supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tiffany Lam commented
With the return to work, this now makes sense to be able to allow an employee to find out where their other coworker is. Ie. if it's wednesday....is their colleague in the office hoteling room A, or are they working in meeting room B, or are they at home?
Tiffany Lam shared this idea ·
-
13 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tiffany Lam commented
I'm noticing a lot have to do with site data, department data, room data, employee data. Those are often due to integration with HR feeds and a need to run highlights on new room based data. Then there's service requests / maintenance requests (ie especially in the public sectors where they track a customer data who is not in the requestor table) so just no place naturally to put that data.
Tiffany Lam shared this idea ·
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tiffany Lam commented
It should be noted the users want to be able to fill this information out a phone portal (webportal). So that they don't have to go to a desk and fill it out.
I am seeing some UserVoice opinion about linkage with reservations/hoteling to maintenance and questionnaires so don't know if there's a way to just link this to maintenance instead so that maintenance could hold the questionnaires and the reference documents.
Tiffany Lam shared this idea ·
-
6 votes
Tiffany Lam shared this idea ·
-
120 votes
Tiffany Lam supported this idea ·
-
13 votes
Tiffany Lam supported this idea ·
Is it just me or is BOMA reporting in V25.2 that gave the ability to review between Method A and Method B is now gone and non existent? Path: Space/Space Inventory/Building Performance/Building Performance
I do understand the configuration parameters to only pick one or the other.