Skip to content
Eptura
Feedback by UserVoice

Archibus

Archibus

Welcome to Archibus's feedback site.  We love hearing from our clients. If you have suggestions for how we can improve our product & provide you with better solutions to your CRE needs, please share them with us. While we can't respond to every suggestion, our product team regularly reviews all of the ideas submitted.

How it works
  • Search to see if your suggestion currently exists
  • If you have a suggestion that’s not listed yet, submit your own
  • Select a category to tell us which part of the platform your feedback is for 

Archibus

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

5 results found

  1. Make the User Defined fields available on the Mobile app for Asset Survey and Registration so that they can be used to collect and correct information.

    33 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  5 comments  ·  Assets  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. When going into the asset lifecycle consoles, a user with the right security group should have the ability to perform bulk edits. It's not efficient to go and edit 1 asset at a time. Especially if a user was using the exceptions reporting and found 3000 assets were missing a value of some property from the exceptions filtering, it makes sense to bulk edit them.

    21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  2 comments  ·  Assets  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. The equipment standard and bulk generation needs to be improved. The use case is if I'm going to make the effort to define an equipment standard where I've added in manufacturer information, CSI information, costs and model information, this should have copied over for the asset registry.

    So here's the use case. I have to create 10 extra equipment that came in a batch. The only thing different about these 10 items is the serial number and the unique asset ID. Meaning it's the same model number, same cost, same extra attributes, same warranty, same PO invoice.

    The improvements that…

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  3 comments  ·  Assets  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. As we use the integration with REVIT for BIM integration, the use of different lengths for different codes of asset tables (eq,ta,fn...)
    It would be good to have the codes (and descriptions) length are all the same (to the longer ones) so they can be treated in similar ways in BIM and other systems.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  0 comments  ·  Assets  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Whenever a user does a task like : Task: Assign Assets to Custodians
    Task File: ab-eam-assign-to-custodian.axvw

    And the user does the following:
    1. Find an equipment
    2. Add an owner custodian via the "+" button
    3. Click on the '...' button on the New Owner name field which will allow one to select a value.

    This select a owner view is called (ab-team-member-select.axvw) and it takes a long time to load, sometimes 20-30 seconds because it seems to pull from the employee, vendor, contacts and the team member tables.

    it would be better to have some default restrictions in these…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  1 comment  ·  Assets  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?